CRT thoughts (and further thoughts)

I thoroughly enjoyed each of the master teachers that provided us with lessons on Friday.  Tina Pasteris did a brilliant job in the creation of her ‘math trails’ activity that we participated in.  The activity was more fun than I remember ever having in any of my math classes growing up, and it was fun for the students around me who said that math “isn’t their thing.”  There were many layers to this activity, but as a whole, it required small groups of students to work together, have choices as to who performed what role in the group, play a game of sorts, get to know their surroundings, be introduced to different culturally relevant items and figure out some math skills all the while.  We looked at art pieces, we went outside, we went into the library, we visited the coffee shop. By having many different types of math problems and exploring them through a moving trail, Tina allowed each of us to learn math and some important local cultural knowledge through our own cultural references.  I was drawn to the art pieces- and learning math through the symmetry of one piece, the height of the totem pole and the hidden images in another piece.  Other students commented on how lovely it was to find salmonberries while outside. Some students really got into the exact lengths and equations to find the length of a whale.  It was a great activity.

IMG_9689
“Look! Math can be fun!” Tina Pasteris ‘math trails’ lesson, UAS campus.

Paula Savikko introduced our class to how deep an educational experience can become when you use the community around you and really focus on place-based education.  Although through the lens of a science teacher, she creates ways to engage her students that allow students to not only learn about science, but utilize other disciplines and think about where they are.  I love that she has her students not only learn about an invasive plant, for example, but take a field-trip to see it, interview people to learn about its’ history, create a presentation to present to panels, make flyers to entice the public to attend presentations, write poetry, etc.  In this way she reaches different learning types in a culturally responsive way- allowing students to see the connection that ‘science’ has with their own lives and the community around them.

What I really appreciated about the lesson introduced to us by Angie Lunda was how she really allowed each group to own their experiment.  My memory of science and science labs in school was that basically, you got a lab sheet, you did an experiment exactly as you were told to do, and then you hoped that you ended up with the ‘correct’ results.  Angie taught through the  objective of ‘teaching students how to think’ and in doing so, allowed each group to experiment and try different things.  And how culturally relevant to look at something that through history, and still in present day, can be used as a ‘diaper’ or other use (moss) and compare its’ ability to absorb liquids with that of a modern diaper.  It gets all students thinking about not only the science behind the lesson, but about the history and people who used this method as well as think about present day choices of modern technology vs. using what is offered and sustainable to harvest around us.

IMG_9690
“Science can be fun, too!” Angie Lunda CRT science lesson, UAS campus.

Although each of the above lessons we were introduced to focused on math and science, I couldn’t help (through my social studies lens) seeing in how many ways all of these lessons could be expanded and overlap into a history or sociology or Alaskan Studies classroom, for example.  The history of living off the land and using things like moss, the impact of invasive species and the history of the communities (like Douglas) that they exist in and the stories behind and history of the totem pole and art pieces, for example, are all ways I could tie these lessons into my classroom.

Although I have not yet mentioned it in my post, probably the most profound experience I had this week was listening to a panel of Tlingit Elders speak to our class and a group of youth on Friday.  I learned and felt so much from each voice and lesson told.  I loved how the youth listened, said thank you, and really seemed to take in what was being said.  I didn’t grow up having experiences like this- where my Elders sat me down and told me stories, taught me lessons.  I also didn’t have any experience learning from Tlingit or other Alaskan Native cultures- in my schools or outside of my school experience.  For many of the Elders that spoke to us, their voices were not heard for many years during times when they were not allowed to speak their language, they were removed from their homes and they were discouraged from being themselves.  Through my teaching, I hope to make sure that their voices are heard and their wisdom passed on.  From the heart, I thank each Elder, the master teachers and our professors for the learning over this past week. “Gunalcheesh.”


FURTHER THOUGHTS ON CRT:

I loved the lesson taught by Michelle Snyder on Attu and Kiska- and WWII history.  As a teacher who will be focused on Social Studies, this was a very helpful lesson.  And even better yet, it was a subject I am fascinated about– and incorporated a region of Alaska and movie (The Aleut Story) that I already was planning on using in the future! What I loved about Michelle’s lesson was the combination of visuals, movies, talking in small groups and then talking as a group.  It wasn’t a lecture– rather, it involved the class learning on their own through material given them.  And it wasn’t too much information- rather, it focused on a small amount of information.

I also really enjoyed Scott Christian’s lesson- which also gave me plenty of ideas for this upcoming year.  He really showed how you can get students excited about learning about their backyards- and really make a difference in the community.  I like the reminder that history lessons can begin out the backdoor.

In a different post, I already spoke of how much fun it was to use children’s picture books in designing secondary curriculum.  Kathy Nielson introduced not only a large collection of Alaska-themed books, but showed us how to look at these books through a multicultural lens and think about the who, what, where, when, why’s of intent of these stories.

Our day ended with Ernestine Hayes doing a reading for our class, followed by powerful words from her heart.  The personal experiences she shared as well as her tips and reminders for us as educators were powerful, and is something I will keep with me for a long time.

 

 

CRT Response

I appreciate how our program here is saturated with the recognition of Tlingit culture. When I first attended Kenai Peninsula College in 2006, the only time the Dena’ina culture was acknowledged was during graduation. In 2009, Alaska Native Oratory Society was introduced to the college, which allowed the Native students to share songs or stories based on Alaska Native values. A rural and Native student liaison was then hired a few years later, a position that encourages the students to build relationships with the local tribe members. KPC has come a long way in recognizing the local culture.

I believe inviting the elders to speak and attending a local Native youth camp are excellent examples of culturally responsive teaching. I’m grateful for the three elders who were willing to come share about their lives. I’m also grateful that the local camp allowed us to come and interview the students and staff and participate in their Tlingit dancing.

One of the campers I interviewed stated that being Tlingit is hard because not everyone accepts them, but that hasn’t stopped her from Tlingit dancing and using her language. She doesn’t want to be the one to blame when her Tlingit culture is lost, so she will do what it takes to keep it alive.

I also interviewed one of the staff members who has a son that attended camp for the past few years. Prior to attending camp, her son constantly struggled to keep his grades up in school. He also didn’t like who he was around other people. But attending camp has allowed him to find his identity and do his best in school. His grades have been excellent ever.

Even though I grew up in rural Alaska, this was my first time seeing a math and science lesson concentrated on the local culture. This certainly is giving me ideas on how I can possibly teach in the coming years. I’m sure it’s going to take a lot of preparation and will certainly need to connect with the local elders to make sure the lessons are accurate.

CRT in the classroom

On Friday I learned a lot about Culturally responsive teaching and the examples that Paula and Angie gave us were just what I needed, because I have never really experienced a culturally responsive math or science lesson so it was hard to know where to start.

The overarching theme of CRT is to make the lesson purposeful and place based. That way students can feel the value of the lesson or project. Purposeful lessons are engaging especially when students understand the desired outcome. Many times growing up, I’d ask why do we need to learn this stuff, and the answers would often be unclear and vague.

I know I have a lot to learn still but I hope to conduct my classroom with a purpose everyday. Where students can feel the impact of what they do. Additionally I will use the resources available to make the classes meaningful whether it is using elders to explain the connectedness of an ecosystem or the local forest service to better understand erosion and its impact on salmon spawning. There are limitless resources that out there, I just have to find them and create meaningful lessons.

Culturally Responsive Teaching: “All the knowledge is in your hands”- John Martin

 

Friday class was a wonderful experience for me, because we had the honor to meet amazing people that had years of knowledge to share with us.

Listening to Paula Savikko I realised that a culturally responsive teacher knows what to teach and how to teach it. As teachers we all have a curriculum that needs to guide us, but how we choose to teach the information is up to us. Her words “own your own curriculum” will stick with me throughout my teaching career. In order to engage your students you need to make the subject accessible to students, be clear about the purpose, and the process.  Culturally responsive teachers coach their students to question, make observations, test hypothesis, consult original sources, connect content to their own lives, collect , and analyze data. It is very important to make time to build relationships with your students and guide them in their attempts. Another good advice from Paula was to involve the parents, community, different organizations in your activities.

The other activity that we’ve done, the Math Trail was a good way to apply our skills and knowledge with another two peers. Working in groups is always engaging, because each member has an idea that is worth exploring. By doing this you can look at a Math problem from a scientific or an artistic point of view. Most of the problems have multiple correct answers. You can reach the same result following different trails.

I would use this in my science class, as a way to connect science with other disciplines like social studies, or art. English classes could be used to introduce a certain historic event through a novel that students would read as part as their English curriculum. Students can create riddles or word games to learn different chemistry or math formulas. I remember what Reuben said when he explained the problem to us: SOH, CAH, TOA.  It made me smile because many people didn’t have a clue what he was talking about at first, but he presented the information in an accessible form to all of us. This is the essence of CRT- ”developing a good recipe of words that you will share with others”( David Katzeek).

Who’s down with CRT? Yeah, you know me! – Further Thoughts on CRT

 

Characteristics of Culturally Responsive Teaching:  I appreciated how Paula Savikko had her students engage in place-based scientific inquiry as shown in her classes investigation and survey of local infestations of Japanese knotweed, her classes’ jellyfish and clam surveys on Juneau beaches, as well as the water-quality/organic life survey of Switzer creek.  Her students had to engage with the history and environment of Juneau while engaged with their work –  be it becoming aware of the purposely introduced knotweed as an ornamental so many decades ago, or becoming aware of the high amount of tailings from former Juneau mines that exist on certain Juneau beaches, or having to interact with a modern state bureaucracy (ADF&G) while securing the “Specimen Collection” permit.  What most impressed me though was that Ms. Savikko created her own audiences for each project (as someone else in our class pointed out).  She invited the public to a CLUE-like presentation of the mysterious knotweed, submitted their scientifically gathered beach survey results to ADF&G and reported their findings to the residential community around Switzer Creek.  That kind of public interfacing moves the theoretical to the actual and is the kind of thing that (hopefully) makes learning more real for students.

The math-trails lesson offered by Tina Pasteris was the only fun math lesson I have ever been given.  In a sense, it didn’t take much, but in another sense it was perfectly tailored to place.  Being asked to solve math “problems” while interfacing with the art and architecture of the UAS campus was really smart and cool.  It was really fun too interacting with my group and functioned as a bonding experience.

The diaper vs. spaghnum moss science experiment offered by Professor Lunda was very similar in concept to Ms. Pasteris’ lesson, except we had to engage with scientific thinking in comparing a resource in our local environment that functioned similarly to a modern day industrial product.  I’ve long appreciated Alaska’s mosses:) and was happy, though not terribly, surprised to hear about their traditional Tlingit use in child-rearing and medicine.  Again this was also a lot of fun and functioned as team building exercise.

Probably the neatest thing for me about the panel of Elders wasn’t anything in particular that was said, but was in watching the interactions between the Elders and the Tlingit youth (but like Matt, I did appreciate the advice that sensing fear is often what causes a bear to strike).  The high school students were so excited and respectful of the Elders; they seemed much more rapt and attentive to the stories being told than the average crowd of high schoolers would be while being talked to by a panel of adults.  I mean, to be fair, on it’s face it wasn’t exactly a dynamic set-up for a crowd of kids: a line of seated adults taking time to speak into a microphone to a room-full of kids.  But the kids were respectful and seemed into it!  I was also impressed by how much the words “Gunalcheesh” were repeated by everyone.  They were repeated far more than they would be in my own white culture.

CRT Strategies in Language Arts:  I’m really interested in the interfacing of Literature with social issues and History.  It also helps to draw parallels or at least comparisons to local issues/history when discussing the issues and history that exist within a novel, story or poem’s world/worldview.  Teaching The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn provides an example for this.  It would be really interesting to discuss and compare the different social milieus between the Missouri river of the pre-Civil War era to the world of the Kuskokwin and Yukon rivers in the 19th and early 20th centuries.  White on Black Slavery vs. Russian and American colonial domination of the Yupik and Athabascan peoples invites obvious discussion.  Just one question:  What were the economic and political forces in each area that were at work?  Another example is a reading of  Things Fall Apart that leads into a discussion about the similarities and differences between the colonial and post-colonial experiences of Nigeria and Alaska Native cultures.


Further Thoughts on CRT

Michelle made me realize that by choosing a culturally relevant topic for the class (WWII in the Aleutians) she could basically hand a bunch of photos and questions to class groups and let us generate discussion. And the fact that (1) the topic was “locally” interesting and (2) presented as questions and not as facts made that possible.

Kathy Nielsen made me realize that there is a use for certain children’s books at the Secondary Level.  But honestly, I wasn’t convinced that most of the books would reach High Schoolers.  However, when one does it’s a great opportunity for visual, auditory (through reading it to the class) and reading learners to receive access to knowledge through a single “device.”  The children’s books that succeed on a high school level need awesome pictures and need to speak to the kids beyond myth.  I found the straight myths to probably be boring to most of the kids.  The right book needs to also tie it back to the local environment, I think.

I appreciated Ernestine Haye’s readings and comments.  She’s had a really tough life and a very inspiring mid life renaissance.  Her commentary though kept coming back to the word “colonialism.”  And I did feel she failed to define what colonialism is to her. Was it federal, was it state, white, modern…all of the above? This normally wouldn’t be a problem, except that she was adamant that we really couldn’t stay on the sidelines. She said that if you don’t actively resist colonialism, you become an ally of it by default.  I might be able to buy that but if a speaker is going to be as strident in her message as she was, I think they owe it to their audience to go into further detail. To define their terms at the least.  Anyway, I appreciate her story, I just wished her “call to arms” was more fully fleshed out.  Before you do that we can’t even really begin a discussion/debate I think.

 

 

 

CRT

Friday’s class had a focus on culturally responsive teaching (CRT) and place based projects that had an impact on what my teaching can include.  I’m not sure if the schools I went to just didn’t feel the need or time to go out in the community but Paula was able to demonstrate how successful you can be by bringing the community to you or going out into it.  The message about being culturally responsive has a huge impact in the classroom because it encompasses the main point of making the material and experience accessible to them.  Also, I think Angie made a great point about having an authentic audience.  It’s true that, as a student, I tend to publish better work knowing that the audience isn’t just my teacher.

I think that a science class has a great opportunity to incorporate other subjects into the classroom.  Not only can the process and hands-on experiments include things like english and art but the assignment can as well.  Paula showed us how poems, brochures and even a PSA using technology can be effective in a science classroom.  Not every student has the same brain and making sure they really understood the lesson can be expressed in many ways and not just the boring lab write-ups.


I just want to try and explain how Ernestine’s words impacted me.  There were many points in her writing that touched me.  I had a wonderful and privileged childhood, but when I got to middle and high school, things changed.  I remember how she talked about that feeling of not being enough to become a “bluebird”.  I am, by no means, comparing my struggles to the devastating hardship she had in and out of her classrooms.  I do, however, want to remember that feeling I had when very few of my teachers DID step up and notice that I was struggling.  I plan on committing myself to being THAT kind of teacher and nothing like the one Ernestine had.  Her words were packed with emotion, her tone spoke with passion and to witness this all will always stay with me and provide the motivation when I start to feel worn out.  I have made it this far and the light continues to shine bright!

Responding to Place, the Community, and the Individual

Culturally responsive teaching means incorporating the environment and the people of the place our classroom shares, as well as considering the cultures represented within each student in the classroom. For example, during the math trail, we were asked to consider our surroundings in a different way than a college campus. While it engaged us in math, we were also engaged in the history and culture of the land we were learning math on! I was struck by the level of community involvement in Paula’s classroom as well, as she brought forest service workers out to help her students’ survey skills or hosted an event at the library for the community to learn about 4th grade research on the history of the neighborhood. The learning seemed to be more powerful when it was rooted in connections with people and places that were “home” to students. All of a sudden, students had purpose and value to their work. I thought working in small groups forced us to grapple with each other’s differences in culture as well. For students, it would take more scaffolding and facilitating, but the experience of confronting conflict, making a compromise, or using someone else’s strategy to solve a problem is transformative to the perspectives and social skills students take with them.

Besides teaching lessons rooted place, I heard from the Elders the importance of each individual’s culture in their learning. Many Elders eluded to the importance of respecting the spirit of each being, of embracing everything and everybody as a resource. I think this is at the core of Gloria Billings’ thoughts on teaching, that everybody’s spirit is acknowledged in the classroom, that everyone has knowledge and capability in them that is wrapped up in the complexity of their culture. Hearing these words from the Elders as well was inspiring, and I think that for educators to really take them to heart, we need to be humble, honest, positive, and flexible.

I have incorporated a few culturally responsive strategies into my music classroom in the past year. At the elementary school level, I invited the cultural specialist to come in and teach the paddle song to 5th graders, as we did a unit on work/functional songs. I have incorporated local songwriters into units on songwriting and invited local performers to come work with students in sectionals. In performance classes, students play for community events such as at the Pioneer Home or the Folk Festival. I am always sure to contextualize each song we learn by exploring where in the world it came from and how it is a reflection of the people’s culture. Certainly, I wish I could find more ways to get students to study music of native cultures, or music of their own culture, but often I feel handicapped by the skills/technique/content I am responsible for teaching. I was inspired by Paula’s amazing connections with the community to create some sort of teaching artist workshop where students could learn native song and dance and perform it together (I believe Sealaska did something similar in Juneau schools last year). A music history class focusing on music of Alaska would also be an incredible project for students to sink their teeth into.
My grand take away from thinking about culturally responsive teaching this week, is that it doesn’t need to be so involved in each lesson. The connections and contextual information can be very subtle, yet still so important. From a year of experiencing this work, I know how difficult the connections can be, yet how rewarding they are. Teaching is really more about facilitation and relationships than about knowledge!

_________________________________

This was my second time hearing about Scott’s interdisciplinary work in Nikiski, but this time I really enjoyed experiencing the quiz at the beginning. I was an opportunity to remember what it feels like when a teacher asks you to bring your cultural background knowledge into the classroom. When a survey like this happens, it provides so much opportunity for involving students in community projects.

I was also very moved by Ernestine Hayes’ reading last week. She is inspiring because she isn’t afraid to say things how they are, no matter how much dis-comfort she might receive. I think this is a behavior to aspire to as a culturally responsive teacher in order to really advocate for our students against a fairly racist system of education we work in.

css.php